Showing posts with label guitar demos. Show all posts
Showing posts with label guitar demos. Show all posts
Wednesday, October 27, 2010
Wednesday, May 20, 2009
Badass 7 String Guitar
I still am learning what to do with it. Its fun.
Also see it in detail:
http://www.zacharyguitars.com/210409pics.htm
Also see it in detail:
http://www.zacharyguitars.com/210409pics.htm
Labels:
blues,
guitar,
guitar demos,
Guitar Tone,
music,
zachary
Thursday, September 25, 2008
Monday, April 7, 2008
Zachary Guitar Videos by Frankie Baker
Well, most of this is duplicated elsewhere in the blog, but to simplify things for people who are only interested in the Zachary Guitars videos - here they are.
The Zachary Z2 Guitar featured in these videos is quite the tasty treat.
Here are two demos that features several pickup settings and styles. The amp settings were not changed during the recording. The first uses a different amp from the second.
Tone demo 1:
An earlier demo:
This short clip (part of a song) is with a clean tone.
In this video, I crank it up to show off the shred or metal type tone capabilities of this bad boy guitar. I think the Z2 is unmatched by any guitar for this kind of use.
Here is an entire song with the Z2. This is the Z Surf Boogie.
I recorded the bass, drums and backing guitar first, the did the lead track on video and mixed it down on iMovie. This is my favorite of the videos on this page.
Here is a clip that compares the sound of a Stratocaster, Telecaster and The Z2 all through the same amp settings. I don't care much for the playing or chops here, its more about comparing the tone of the guitars. Some guy on youtube commented that my Strat is ugly. Well, I like it. Its certainly not beautiful like a Zachary, but it has that Fender 50s car kind of vibe. Nonetheless I'd trade an endless pile of Strats of any kind for one Zachary. Imagine what SRV or Jimi could have done with a Z.
The Zachary Z2 Guitar featured in these videos is quite the tasty treat.
Here are two demos that features several pickup settings and styles. The amp settings were not changed during the recording. The first uses a different amp from the second.
Tone demo 1:
An earlier demo:
This short clip (part of a song) is with a clean tone.
In this video, I crank it up to show off the shred or metal type tone capabilities of this bad boy guitar. I think the Z2 is unmatched by any guitar for this kind of use.
Here is an entire song with the Z2. This is the Z Surf Boogie.
I recorded the bass, drums and backing guitar first, the did the lead track on video and mixed it down on iMovie. This is my favorite of the videos on this page.
Here is a clip that compares the sound of a Stratocaster, Telecaster and The Z2 all through the same amp settings. I don't care much for the playing or chops here, its more about comparing the tone of the guitars. Some guy on youtube commented that my Strat is ugly. Well, I like it. Its certainly not beautiful like a Zachary, but it has that Fender 50s car kind of vibe. Nonetheless I'd trade an endless pile of Strats of any kind for one Zachary. Imagine what SRV or Jimi could have done with a Z.
Labels:
guitar,
guitar demos,
Guitar Tone,
music,
zachary
Thursday, March 20, 2008
Z Surf Boogie
I am happy with the way this turned out. It was more complicated than the typical youtube thing with a guy playing along with a speakers into a video cam mic. I hope you agree that it is well mixed.
Check out my tunes on Garage Band. Download the mp3 for your iPod.
Labels:
blues,
guitar,
guitar demos,
Guitar Tone,
zachary
Monday, February 4, 2008
The Amazing Zachary Z2 Guitar
The search for the holy grail of guitars continues. For the moment this is it. The precision of the fretwork and beauty of the artistry of this guitar is incredible. It is a unique departure from what all other guitar makers are doing. Before I mention any downside, I must say I consider this guitar priceless. It is the only guitar I have that I would simply not part with for any reason. It is simply the best of them all.
Now that said, I would have no credibility if I was such a fool as to say one guitar does everything and is the perfect guitar for all applications. That would be ridiculous. For example, the best jazzbox simply can't do good rock crunch. And this guitar can't do jazzbox. But I'm no Joe Pass either, and I don't play that kind of music well anyway. So I am being real. The Z2 cannot replace an entire collection of guitars. But it does stand on top of the heap. It is the very best with respect to several critical measures that I am concerned with. First of all, the intonation and fretwork is simply unmatched. Every single chord and note is perfectly in tune and harmonically balanced both within the scale and chord being played. I am not talking about anything other than my ear. It simply works. It is a bit on the bright side, which is probably due to its long scale, pickup design and placement, a relatively hard wood body, and very, very low action. I don't think it will replace my best strat clone (which can't touch this Z2 for the most part) for "that" tone. The Z2 is it is magic to the fingers and the ears. And it flat ass honks. This guitar kills for rock crunch. Billy Gibbons needs this guitar. As soon as he finds out about them good luck trying to get one for yourself, they will become legendary and impossible to obtain for mere mortals. I almost hate to tell you about it lest the build wait get longer. I want at least two more of these guitars and the more people that find out about it the longer I must wait. Good luck getting one, if you can't play you are out of luck. No posers need apply.
Click here to find out more about Zachary Guitars
Labels:
blues,
guitar,
guitar demos,
Guitar Tone,
music,
zachary
Saturday, January 12, 2008
Cool Guitar Amp
(Well, yes and the guitar deserves some credit too.)
Howdy, its been a long time since I've found anything to share. The quest for guitar tone tends to get more difficult and you begin to think you have seen it all. Recently I ran across the Suhr Badger. Now I don't need to tell you about it because there is plenty of info if you just search the web for it, you can find out all you need. The important thing is that for once, all of the good stuff that is being said about it is really true. I suppose you read the harmony central reviews, or even the reviews of products on sites like musician's friend. Well there are several problems with all of that. First of all some people (particularly electric guitar players) do not hear very well. Next, if all you have ever experienced is junk, something really mediocre could sound really great. Then, if some guitar god endorses it you might think its wonderful too. And if you just dumped a whole pile of money on something it must be good, otherwise you are stupid, right?
Click Here for the Harmony Central Reviews
Well the truth is a lot of guys have been playing the guitar for a long time, and some of us have been through not just a couple of guitar amps, and not just cheap ones either. So when you read the harmony central reviews on the Suhr Badger, you might think this is just another over-hyped and over-priced amp. Well its not entirely. It deserves some amount of praise. This amp can be enjoyed at low volumes. This is the first and only amp I have experienced that does decent big amp sound at truly reasonable volumes. In spite of its lack of reverb, it has a perfect effects loop so you can pick your favorite stomp boxes and plug them right in between the tube pre and power amps. I find it to be a wonderful place to put a nice digital reverb or delay. I'm not much of a fan of digital effects, but the tube tone from circuitry in this amp doesn't seem to be damaged by using the effects loop. Of course it adds a bit of noise, etc. and for recording you are better off adding this stuff in the mix, but its a great for live use.
This amp has a likable tone with a killer "not so loud" feature that works. I don't think its as good as a couple of other amps I have when clean, but I think I still have some speaker break-in issues to resolve, so we will see with time.
The demo video was recorded with my Onyx Forge Custom "Jag S". It has A Kinman strat blues set and an LR Baggs piezo hardtail bridge. I switch only the controls on the guitar, and get several killer tones through this amp without modifying ANY settings on the amp. So, generally all you are getting is the crunchy sound. But interestingly enough, what you are hearing was not very loud when I recorded it so its a good amp for that, and a bit more satisfying than all the digital stuff.
I don't claim this is great music, its really a tone demo. But I was having fun and made it a bit too long. Sorry, every minute or two I switch the tone settings, so keep at it and you will hear what I mean.
Another thing, this is using a the Suhr 112 ported cab. Which is very small and easy to live with and lug around. But its no Marshall 412 cab. This head sounds even better through a good 412, but I'm too old and lazy to move one around.
Many have said that you should always spend at least as much on your amp as you do on a guitar, and that is decent advice, but to be fair, this amp is a lot less expensive than many, many amps I have owned and played that were far more expensive and far less satisfying.
Howdy, its been a long time since I've found anything to share. The quest for guitar tone tends to get more difficult and you begin to think you have seen it all. Recently I ran across the Suhr Badger. Now I don't need to tell you about it because there is plenty of info if you just search the web for it, you can find out all you need. The important thing is that for once, all of the good stuff that is being said about it is really true. I suppose you read the harmony central reviews, or even the reviews of products on sites like musician's friend. Well there are several problems with all of that. First of all some people (particularly electric guitar players) do not hear very well. Next, if all you have ever experienced is junk, something really mediocre could sound really great. Then, if some guitar god endorses it you might think its wonderful too. And if you just dumped a whole pile of money on something it must be good, otherwise you are stupid, right?
Click Here for the Harmony Central Reviews
Well the truth is a lot of guys have been playing the guitar for a long time, and some of us have been through not just a couple of guitar amps, and not just cheap ones either. So when you read the harmony central reviews on the Suhr Badger, you might think this is just another over-hyped and over-priced amp. Well its not entirely. It deserves some amount of praise. This amp can be enjoyed at low volumes. This is the first and only amp I have experienced that does decent big amp sound at truly reasonable volumes. In spite of its lack of reverb, it has a perfect effects loop so you can pick your favorite stomp boxes and plug them right in between the tube pre and power amps. I find it to be a wonderful place to put a nice digital reverb or delay. I'm not much of a fan of digital effects, but the tube tone from circuitry in this amp doesn't seem to be damaged by using the effects loop. Of course it adds a bit of noise, etc. and for recording you are better off adding this stuff in the mix, but its a great for live use.
This amp has a likable tone with a killer "not so loud" feature that works. I don't think its as good as a couple of other amps I have when clean, but I think I still have some speaker break-in issues to resolve, so we will see with time.
The demo video was recorded with my Onyx Forge Custom "Jag S". It has A Kinman strat blues set and an LR Baggs piezo hardtail bridge. I switch only the controls on the guitar, and get several killer tones through this amp without modifying ANY settings on the amp. So, generally all you are getting is the crunchy sound. But interestingly enough, what you are hearing was not very loud when I recorded it so its a good amp for that, and a bit more satisfying than all the digital stuff.
I don't claim this is great music, its really a tone demo. But I was having fun and made it a bit too long. Sorry, every minute or two I switch the tone settings, so keep at it and you will hear what I mean.
Another thing, this is using a the Suhr 112 ported cab. Which is very small and easy to live with and lug around. But its no Marshall 412 cab. This head sounds even better through a good 412, but I'm too old and lazy to move one around.
Many have said that you should always spend at least as much on your amp as you do on a guitar, and that is decent advice, but to be fair, this amp is a lot less expensive than many, many amps I have owned and played that were far more expensive and far less satisfying.
Sunday, September 30, 2007
Onyx Forge Custom Jag S
A new guitar in the collection has arrived. You can read the details here C25 Onyx
And you can hear it in this video:
This is currently my favorite guitar. I put 11s on it which is more beefy than the usual 10s. I think its the ideal "Nashville" and "SRV" axe.
And you can hear it in this video:
This is currently my favorite guitar. I put 11s on it which is more beefy than the usual 10s. I think its the ideal "Nashville" and "SRV" axe.
Saturday, August 11, 2007
Zachary Guitar Pedal
Update - August 16, 2007:
I have been spending a lot of time with this pedal. It seems to be ridiculous to say it, but it is brilliant. It is the best investment in gear I have made since I purchased a '69 Tele for $150 when I was 17. (damn I wished I was smart enough to have kept it) This pedal is so musical. (I will keep this.) Of course it is brutal in revealing your warts as a player, and the tone shortcomings of your guitars and amps, but it is also insanely rewarding when it uncovers the harmonics of your best gear and the skill you have as a player. After redoing the setup on my Tele, it is sweet through this pedal. I think a couple of my other pedals are going on e-bay in a couple of more weeks if I don't use them. This one takes the cake.
Note - my previous post of August 11 - five days previous:
Occasionally, one runs across something that lives up to its maker's hype. This is one of those things. Of course the hype here is over the top, and quite honestly I'm not sure how much better than some other units I have tried this really is, but in my opinion this IS the best guitar pedal available now for the kind of sound I like.
Here is a link to clip of me fooling around with this pedal. Part of it actually is musical and includes a chunk of a song, but mostly its a tone demo.
Expect to hear it in the mix of some of my upcoming tunes.
Am I plugging this guy's pedal? Well I suppose. I like to see good things get the attention they deserve. Also, if you check it out this might in fact be something that enhances my credibility as a person who is has knowledge about getting good guitar tone. And, we will see over time about getting rid of the other pedals. If I end up not using them for quite a while, that's exactly what I might end up doing.
A couple of other overdrive pedals I use include the Fulltone OCD, Barber Burn Unit and the Xotic AC Booster. I think the Zach pedal can replace the Fulltone and Barber, but the AC Booster is kind of in a class by itself for the sound it makes. The Fulltone, in some ways I prefer to the Zachary pedal because it produces a good grind that you can hide in a bit more easily than the Zachary pedal. The Zachary pedal is more transparent and up front, and brings forth both your excellence and flaws. It has a wider freqency footprint, and for some kinds of music, the OCD might be easier to deal EQ wise with in the mix.
To be fair about how good this pedal is, I don't think I would have bothered with the Barber or OCD if I had the Zachary first.
Sunday, July 29, 2007
Telecaster Shootout
Scroll down to get right at the video if you are not interested in the text..
Well, as I mentioned I suffer from Guitar Aquisition Syndrome. My most recent attack concerned a '62 Custom Telecaster. Actually not a real '62 as these are out of my league (and honestly in my humble opinion are more valuable from rarity as opposed to utility or musical value). This guitar was recently built by Fender to almost identical specs to the original '62. It features vintage frets on a rosewood fingerboard, a nitro finish, 3 saddle bridge. Not specifically looking to buy a guitar, I played this one at a local shop and found it to be exceptionally nice from both a tone and cosmetic perspective. Forgetting that I already have a perfectly good Telecaster I bought it. Then I got home. I rewired the tone and switch - (the '62 had a dumb forward position with a dark neck setting and no split setting) I don't know anyone who actually uses one of these and leaves it that way. I didn't care much for the vintage 3 saddle bridge that had problems with string spacing and intonation, so I upgraded that to a Callaham compensated brass saddle bridge. Now I really like the tone, in fact I prefer it tone wise to my other Tele, except perhaps for the hum when using it really in a really high gain setting (which is not really a Tele thing anyway).
Well, what about the other Tele. It's still a really nice guitar, and better than the '62 in some ways for a couple reasons. It's an '06 American Deluxe Ash, with a nice thick maple neck, jumbo frets, and SCN pickups. Its a bit heavy. It stays in tune more easily and has almost no hum from the truly noiseless pickups.
Well I decided to play them back to back and decide which one sounds better. Here's a video if you'd like to post your opinion, I'd be interested.
A couple of notes. To be fair, the Deluxe has 9s, and while easier to bend, they don't have quite the tone of the 10s on the '62. But the Deluxe has jumbo frets and I just couldn't hear the Tele tone I was looking for (a bit of string slap and more twang) from 10s - the 9s did that. The '62 has vintage frets and I like that sound. I might try 9s on the '62 - but the 10s feel pretty good and sound nice.
The bridge swapout didn't change the dramatically - a bit smoother and more sustain - from what I can tell, but I do like the compensated saddles, and the string spacing from the original 62 bridge was bogus with the grooves and screws interfering with a straight string path. (I saved the bridge so when I resell the guitar I will have all the vintage pieces).
Well, as I mentioned I suffer from Guitar Aquisition Syndrome. My most recent attack concerned a '62 Custom Telecaster. Actually not a real '62 as these are out of my league (and honestly in my humble opinion are more valuable from rarity as opposed to utility or musical value). This guitar was recently built by Fender to almost identical specs to the original '62. It features vintage frets on a rosewood fingerboard, a nitro finish, 3 saddle bridge. Not specifically looking to buy a guitar, I played this one at a local shop and found it to be exceptionally nice from both a tone and cosmetic perspective. Forgetting that I already have a perfectly good Telecaster I bought it. Then I got home. I rewired the tone and switch - (the '62 had a dumb forward position with a dark neck setting and no split setting) I don't know anyone who actually uses one of these and leaves it that way. I didn't care much for the vintage 3 saddle bridge that had problems with string spacing and intonation, so I upgraded that to a Callaham compensated brass saddle bridge. Now I really like the tone, in fact I prefer it tone wise to my other Tele, except perhaps for the hum when using it really in a really high gain setting (which is not really a Tele thing anyway).
Well, what about the other Tele. It's still a really nice guitar, and better than the '62 in some ways for a couple reasons. It's an '06 American Deluxe Ash, with a nice thick maple neck, jumbo frets, and SCN pickups. Its a bit heavy. It stays in tune more easily and has almost no hum from the truly noiseless pickups.
Well I decided to play them back to back and decide which one sounds better. Here's a video if you'd like to post your opinion, I'd be interested.
A couple of notes. To be fair, the Deluxe has 9s, and while easier to bend, they don't have quite the tone of the 10s on the '62. But the Deluxe has jumbo frets and I just couldn't hear the Tele tone I was looking for (a bit of string slap and more twang) from 10s - the 9s did that. The '62 has vintage frets and I like that sound. I might try 9s on the '62 - but the 10s feel pretty good and sound nice.
The bridge swapout didn't change the dramatically - a bit smoother and more sustain - from what I can tell, but I do like the compensated saddles, and the string spacing from the original 62 bridge was bogus with the grooves and screws interfering with a straight string path. (I saved the bridge so when I resell the guitar I will have all the vintage pieces).
Sunday, May 20, 2007
Onyx Forge Custom DC
This is one tone monster of a guitar. Custom built to my specs by Roy Bullis of Laguna Hills, CA.
This guitar features a mahogany body, quilt top, maple neck with ebony fingerboard. It has Seymour Duncan Pearly Gates humbucking pickups, and an LR Baggs piezo bridge. Coils on the pickups can be split and the piezo mixed. Instead of a switch, there is a blend pot for the pickups.
This guitar features a mahogany body, quilt top, maple neck with ebony fingerboard. It has Seymour Duncan Pearly Gates humbucking pickups, and an LR Baggs piezo bridge. Coils on the pickups can be split and the piezo mixed. Instead of a switch, there is a blend pot for the pickups.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)